icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
16 Jan, 2012 11:22

PR or pledges? Putin's campaign principles debated

PR or pledges? Putin's campaign principles debated

A thorough campaign position overview or evidence of the need for new thinking? Vladimir Putin’s 2012 presidential campaign program published in Izvestia daily has split opinions.

Sergey Markov, director of the Institute for Political Research, believes Putin is trying to answer the main question people in Russia as well as abroad want to ask: why is he running for president? “The answer is pretty clear,” Markov told RT. Putin wants to continue overseeing Russia’s development and its transformation from post-Soviet restoration to stable economic growth and to make the middle class a majority in Russian society.According to Markov, Putin believes he is the best candidate, because “he and his team are pretty young and energetic and have achieved a lot. When they came to power the country was seriously destroyed. Russia was under threat from terrorism, and there was chronic poverty in many regions. Putin’s team has managed to address these issues and realize a quality of life that a decade ago seemed impossible to many.”Publishing an article in Izvestia is, according to Markov, a throwback to the style of Putin’s first presidential term (2000-2004) when he also published a large program article prior to the elections explaining “who Putin is, what he wanted and what he had to propose to citizens.” Markov also noted that the ruling United Russia party – which is chaired by the PM – is not mentioned in the text because Putin has distanced himself from it for the sake of his presidential campaign. “[The party] is becoming unpopular with voters. As we know, Putin has never been a member of the party; he wisely kept a cautious distance from it,” Markov said. The explanation is that, generally speaking, the majority of people link all positive development in Russia to Putin, while associating negatives with United Russia. As an experienced politician, the candidate clearly understands the dynamic.Evgeny Minchenko, director of the International Institute of Political Expertise believes that the major idea he got from the article is that Vladimir Putin’s presidential campaign staff “took on board a conservative strategy”. They do not aim at attracting new supporters. Putin maintains the idea of supporting the needy (poor) part of society. As for political freedoms, the PM’s stance has not changed either, the expert told RT. Putin welcomes society “to take part in small activities, such as improving courtyards and charity”. Concerning politics, “everything is fine there.”According to Minchenko, Putin follows the logic that has become traditional for the ruling party: “One shouldn’t change horses in midstream. Look at what we have already achieved.” As a representative of the so-called middle class that Putin mentioned in the text, Minchenko says he would like to know the PM’s position considering political reforms suggested by President Dmitry Medvedev. “But I cannot find out anything about that from the article,” he observed. The expert said that he would also like to know which way the system of those “social and staff lifts” that Putin mentioned would work. “I’d like see example of such successful uplifting, except for when it comes to ‘prodigy’ children of our ministers and high-ranking officials,” he noted.Another expert, Director of the Center for Political Technologies Igor Bunin, believes that the part of Putin’s program published on Monday is largely a PR action and does not reflect new ideas. “The idea is simple: ‘It is either me (Putin) or catastrophe. Me or chaos. Because I saved the country from dissolution and so on,” Bunin told Interfax. Concrete goals could probably be published later, he added.Meanwhile, some political opponents have ranked Putin’s program highly. Ivan Melnikov of the Communist Party and a State Duma first deputy speaker said "Those extracts I have seen indicate that Putin has managed to make the most of the narrow room he has to maneuver. In this respect, the article is very well-thought out and high-quality.” However, the article “has clear political flaws,” Melnikov pointed out. First of all, given all hopes lost, people do not trust politics. The second serious flaw is “the style indicating that there is no alternative to Putin as a presidential candidate and the unwillingness to admit that there are still forces in the country that have a leader, a team, and a program.”A co-chairman of liberal party Yabloko, Sergey Mitrokhin, believes that Vladimir Putin’s manifesto is an attempt to divert public attention from burning issues. “Putin’s call for a dialogue with society leaves a very strange impression. The community has already begun its dialogue with the power, took part in [election protest] rallies and made its demands. If Putin truly wants this dialogue, he should respond to those demands,” the opposition politician told RIA Novosti. Political analyst Maksim Grigoriev, on the other hand, notes that there are many interesting things in the article and the fact that Putin invites Russians for a dialogue about the country’s future is important. “It is very important that the article is addressed to the middle class,” he underlined. Representatives of that part of Russian society have lately been openly voicing their civil position. In his program post Putin stressed that the middle class should increase, which means that he “understands and apprehends changes” happening in the country. A co-chairman of liberal party Yabloko, Sergey Mitrokhin, believes that Vladimir Putin’s manifesto is an attempt to divert public attention from burning issues. “Putin’s call for a dialogue with society leaves a very strange impression. The community has already begun its dialogue with the power, took part in [election protest] rallies and made its demands. If Putin truly wants this dialogue, he should respond to those demands,” the opposition politician told RIA Novosti. Political analyst Maksim Grigoriev, on the other hand, notes that there are many interesting things in the article and the fact that Putin invites Russians for a dialogue about the country’s future is important. “It is very important that the article is addressed to the middle class,” he underlined. Representatives of that part of Russian society have lately been openly voicing their civil position. In his program post Putin stressed that the middle class should increase, which means that he “understands and apprehends changes” happening in the country.

Podcasts
0:00
26:13
0:00
24:57