icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
31 Mar, 2016 16:56

‘Unprecedented divergence between UK & US approach towards Russia’ – UK Conservative MP

‘Unprecedented divergence between UK & US approach towards Russia’ – UK Conservative MP

The UK Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond’s comments on Russia are disappointing, especially compared with the extremely positive comments by John Kerry about engaging with Moscow, says UK Foreign Affairs Select Committee member Daniel Kawczynski MP.

The British Foreign Secretary accused Russia of “ignoring the norms of international conduct and breaking the rules of the international system,” which according to Philip Hammond “represents a challenge and a threat to all of us.”

RT: How do you interpret such an anti-Russian stance of Philip Hammond?

Daniel Kawczynski: Unfortunately, the foreign secretary is only reflecting the general mood of the Conservative Parliamentary Party and the House of Commons as a whole. Much to my regret, there is probably a majority of members of Parliament from all political parties that view Russia in a somewhat cautious way, and are very fearful of Russian motives. And I find that very regrettable because I think we need to do more to challenge our own government as to why the relationship (with Russia) is getting worse and what steps they are doing to try to improve the situation.

RT: Even Pentagon officials have praised Russian actions in Syria. Why do you think the UK stays so reluctant to cooperate with Moscow?

DK: It is very interesting to see very increasingly different approaches towards Moscow from Washington in comparison with London. I have never known such a divergence between the two capitals in their approach towards Russia. I have been following US Secretary of State John Kerry’s twitter recently which has some extremely positive comments about engaging with Russia in stark contrast to what British Foreign Secretary is saying - which is obviously very disappointing. What I would like to say is that we on the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, we understand the importance of Anglo-Russian relations. It is our responsibility to hold the government to account on foreign policy. And our forthcoming report on Anglo-Russian relations will see us visiting Moscow in May where we will be meeting with our Russian counterparts, and I very much hope to be able to get first-hand experience from them as to what their perspectives are so that we can fit this into the report which will go to the House of Commons, the government and our own media.  

Michael Raddie, co-Editor of BSNews commented to RT: “Phillip Hammond and particularly Michael Fallon, they’ve been relentlessly critical of Russia and in particular President Putin. But I don’t think sensible people in the UK actually take people like Michael Fallon seriously anymore…”

RT: The UK Foreign Secretary made these rather strong statements just a week after ISIS's attacks on Brussels. What needs to happen in your opinion to convince the UK that international anti-terror cooperation is needed?

DK: That if I may say so is an absolutely pivotal question. Why is it that there is no greater sense of urgency and determination to put aside our differences and no matter how temporarily whether it is to do with Ukraine or infringements of Estonian air space…We can put them aside for one moment. And actually collaborate together with one another to take on what is a death cult which is a horrendous threat to both us and Moscow.


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Podcasts
0:00
23:13
0:00
25:0