icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
21 Sep, 2021 01:36

Missouri Supreme Court asked to suspend law licenses of St. Louis couple charged & pardoned after waving guns at BLM protesters

Missouri Supreme Court asked to suspend law licenses of St. Louis couple charged & pardoned after waving guns at BLM protesters

A Missouri official has petitioned the state’s Supreme Court to suspend the law licenses of the St. Louis couple charged and later pardoned after aiming guns at a crowd of protesters outside their home last year.

In a Monday filing, Missouri’s chief disciplinary counsel Alan Pratzel asked the state’s highest court to reprimand Mark and Patricia McCloskey over the June 2020 incident, in which the couple brandished weapons at a group of demonstrators who entered their gated community to protest at the nearby home of former St. Louis Mayor Lyda Krewson. Though no shots were fired and nobody was harmed, footage of the encounter circulated widely and garnered national attention, resulting in charges for the McCloskeys. 

While they ultimately received a pardon from Missouri Governor Mike Parson in June, Mark McCloskey earlier pleaded guilty to misdemeanor fourth-degree assault and was fined $750, while his wife Patricia pleaded guilty to misdemeanor harassment and was ordered to pay a fine of $2,000. 

Also on rt.com Missouri governor pardons St. Louis couple who brandished guns at BLM protesters

In calling for an indefinite suspension with no ability to apply for reinstatement for at least six months, Pratzel argued that the McCloskeys’ actions showed “indifference to public safety” and demonstrated “moral turpitude,” adding that while a pardon may undo a conviction, “the person’s guilt remains.” He also cited previous cases in which lawyers were disciplined for similar acts involving “moral turpitude.”

It is so far unclear how the state Supreme Court will respond to the request, which comes from the state’s top legal ethics watchdog.

The McCloskeys’ case came at the height of nationwide police brutality protests kicked off by the death of George Floyd in May 2020 and was highly polarizing, with critics insisting the couple had harassed peaceful racial justice protesters, while supporters argued they were merely exercising their Second Amendment rights on their own property.

Despite entering guilty pleas, the couple has remained unapologetic in public comments, with Mark – who has since launched a US Senate campaign – even saying he would “do it again.” 

“Anytime the mob approaches me, I’ll do what I can to put them in imminent threat of physical injury because that’s what kept them from destroying my house and my family,” he said.

Both Mark and Patricia were admitted to the Missouri bar in 1986, according to local media. They practice together under the McCloskey Law Center in St. Louis, and reportedly focus on personal injury and medical malpractice cases. 

Also on rt.com St. Louis couple who confronted BLM protesters surrender their guns to the state… then buy NEW AR-15

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Podcasts
0:00
23:13
0:00
25:0