‘Iraqi army lacks credibility as Al-Qaeda gains momentum’
Al-Qaeda in Iraq has the will to fight while the government forces are very weak and have no control in a country struggling to cope with the bloodshed, Anders Kaergaard, a former Danish intelligence officer told RT.
The Al-Qaeda militants seized the
cities of Fallujah and Ramadi last week, while the Iraqi army
deployed tanks and artillery to the besieged western province of
Anbar. The militants in control of Fallujah are known to be the
most radical jihadist wing of the Syrian rebels.
RT: The capture of these cities… what does
it tell you about how powerful Al-Qaeda has grown?
Anders Kaergaard: Basically I think it tells us
how weak the Iraqi government and the Iraqi government forces
are. Because the fighting ability of the ISIS (the Islamic state
of Iraq and Levant), for instance, is very strong but very
contained to localized battles, whereas the Iraqi army really is
supposed to be in control of the country, but it isn’t. I think
it tells us a lot about the willingness of the ISIS to fight and
the lack in the Iraqi army.
RT: The United States is said to be
equipping the Iraqi army against potential offences like this.
But what chance does the Iraqi army have?
AK: This battle isn’t about equipment, far from
it. This battle is about stamina. And one thing the ISIS and the
rebels have is stamina. They want to continue fighting. And the
Irqui army really hasn’t got a chance to fight these militias or
to eradicate them. I think this battle cannot be won on the
battleground. It has to be solved by negotiations.
RT: About two years ago, President Obama
told the world Al-Qaeda was on the run. How much support does
Al-Qaeda have in Iraq, would you say, having served there? Are
people sympathetic towards it? Why has Al-Qaeda grown so much
momentum?
AK: In my opinion, Al-Qaeda has never been on
the run. It has been downscaling due to pressure. But once the
pressure is lifted the organization is back in full force. And it
uses these forces to regain strength. Prior to the Invasion of
Iraq there weren’t really any Al- Qaeda in Iraq. There was a
small group called the Ansar al-Islam, which Saddam Hussain tried
to eradicate. But since we weren’t able to find any weapons of
mass destruction a lot of media coverage was given to Al-Qaeda in
Iraq because that was one of the reasons we originally went
there. But Al-Qaeda hasn’t been on the run. The general
population is not pro-Al-Qaeda I would say, but they are not
pro-Iraqi army as well. This is due to a high concentration of
Shia militias within these army forces. Much of the Sunni
population and big parts of the Shia population, who are not
sympathetic to militias, do not feel any confidence in the Iraqi
security forces. Therefore due to this lack in credibility in the
Iraqi security forces, Al-Qaeda is given some room to maneuver.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.