icon bookmark-bicon bookmarkicon cameraicon checkicon chevron downicon chevron lefticon chevron righticon chevron upicon closeicon v-compressicon downloadicon editicon v-expandicon fbicon fileicon filtericon flag ruicon full chevron downicon full chevron lefticon full chevron righticon full chevron upicon gpicon insicon mailicon moveicon-musicicon mutedicon nomutedicon okicon v-pauseicon v-playicon searchicon shareicon sign inicon sign upicon stepbackicon stepforicon swipe downicon tagicon tagsicon tgicon trashicon twicon vkicon yticon wticon fm
21 May, 2015 23:15

Citing Bin Laden raid, US Special Forces testing DNA scanners for ‘juicy missions’

Citing Bin Laden raid, US Special Forces testing DNA scanners for ‘juicy missions’

Officials at US Special Operations Command said they were testing rapid DNA scanners for use in sensitive overseas missions, citing DNA identification of Osama Bin Laden in the 2011 raid as a model for future targeted operations.

Two types of devices are currently being tested at “forward locations,” a representative of the US Special Operations Command (SOCOM) confirmed to Defense One. While the exact location of the tests was not revealed, the magazine mentioned “midnight raids in places like Pakistan and Syria.”

Because the program is very new, “we’re saving it for the juicy missions,” said Michael S. Fitz, manager of the Sensitive Site Exploitation Special Reconnaissance, Surveillance & Exploitation program at SOCOM.

#SpecialOps Are Using Rapid #DNA Readers- get results on the battle field. http://t.co/X7NUmZ3y9l via @defenseone

— Robert Morton (@Robert4787) May 21, 2015

These things are downrange and we’re spending a year gathering data — on the utility, on how well is it working, the match rate, how well are the operators keeping them up and running,” Fitz told Defense One.

Two devices being tested are the RapidHIT 200, from the California-based company IntegenX, and the DNAscan from the Massachusetts-based NetBIO. The devices weigh about 60 pounds (27kg) apiece, and are about the size of a photocopying machine. Each costs about $250,000. They only require a single operator and can turn out a result in 90 minutes.

“In the past, when we captured DNA, the guy would put it in an envelope, send it back to the States and two or three weeks later, he would get a result,” said Fitz. While that may work for the judiciary, it was worthless for the military’s purpose of confirming targets.

Our whole program is built around follow-on targeting. We don’t gather biometrics for criminal prosecution,” Fitz said. “Our primary objective is actionable intelligence for follow-on targeting.”

READ MORE: US special forces kill senior ISIS commander in Syria raid - DoD

Fitz brought up the 2011 Bin Laden raid, where the terrorist mastermind was reportedly identified via DNA analysis. The idea behind the program is to extend the same treatment to future “terrorist suspects and insurgents” targeted by US special operations teams.

According to the official, the ultimate goal is to have a DNA reader the size of a cell phone, rugged and battery powered, that could be used by soldiers to collect DNA during the mission, and connect to a database to verify the results.

Such devices do not yet exist, however. The earliest a prototype might be available for testing is 2019, and that would require a major effort.

There's no way a 90-minute DNA test would return false positives, right? I mean, there's only life on the line. http://t.co/sS8TWXQMJt

— Tim Cushing (@TimCushing) May 21, 2015

Another problem is the lack of records in the database. Current databases only have records on US citizens. Very little DNA collection has been done in places like Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq and Syria, Fitz explained, adding that the military saw little use for the process at the time since getting DNA results was taking too long.

He compared DNA scanners to currently used biometric technology.

When we first went out with fingerprints we got about a 5 percent match rate. Now we’ve populated the database, so we get 40 percent match,” said Fitz. “You’ve got to start somewhere.”

Podcasts
0:00
26:13
0:00
24:57